…lies this tree! I love this tree and, at least what I’m ascribing to it in terms of how it got that way.

The first interesting aspect of this situation is the equal priority both have been given in access to the right-of-way along the road. In most modern cities or suburbs, I can say with near certainty that this tree would be cut down. Why would a city not do what they have done here? Because the tree’s trunk is growing directly below the wire. The tree will certainly converge back on the wire and ensnare it again, requiring perpetual pruning. Plus, if the tree were to fall either towards or away from the road, it could take the wire with it; the tree forms what is almost a ring around the wire. To a provider of infrastructure, both risks not worth sparing the tree.

Another interesting aspect of this situation is how the tree has adapted to its situation. The tree has grown more “bushy” on both sides of the wire, almost joining again at the top. How often it is pruned, I’m not sure, but this tree seems to have essentially become two trees.

Has the wire or the infrastructure adapted to the presence of the tree? Seemingly no, but maybe when installing this line, the pole to support the wire was put near this tree on purpose. Since the pole lifts the wire up to its highest point (it droops in-between poles), it helps the tree to have the wire higher above it; there’s less chance to have the wire end up resting on the tree.

The tree is also likely spared by the fact that this pole looks to only carry telecom cables. I can’t tell whether the thinner wire second from the top is electrical or not–if so, it would *really* surprise me that this tree was allowed to remain as it is; it’s an easy path to ground. My bet is that there is no electricity on this pole.

An interesting reflection of somebody’s values that you don’t see everyday!

I’ve been really busy at work lately, feverishly working on a year-long project that is being shoe-horned into the last few weeks of my employment. We’re working with a design firm to design the interactions and visuals of the site, and I’m building it. Ugh.

One of the things the designers frequently bring up is “open source”. “There’s an open source package that does that, so it should be easy…” is often the predicate to their argument. Open source also came up during my interview with eyebeam yesterday. The director described the lab and process there as “open source”–they like to distribute information openly and freely. Sounds good!

While I agree with many of the philosophies of open source (but not the elitism), I am now starting to shudder when I hear the term. First, the designers just don’t understand how software works. They specify many rich (i.e. AJAX, confirm dialogs, visually rich UI, etc.) interactions–open source packages are usually ugly. Usually. One can *easily* spend as much time required to rewrite a piece of functionality, integrating and modifying an open source package to do the same task up to specification. Open source does not mean something’s been “done”. Open source packages are more like software libraries than finished projects–they provide handy routines/modules, but aren’t usually finished in and of themselves. Unless you are okay with the usually conservative, sometimes useless default UIs and settings they “ship” with.

Hearing the words “open source” from eyebeam made my eyes roll because it’s now also become a synonym for freely, publicly disseminated anything. And I’m not really arguing with that part of it, nor the philosophy behind it. But eyebeam doesn’t open source everything they make, as promised. Take their WaveBubble project (essentially a cellular phone jammer) for instance (here or here). I know it’s illegal, but I want to build one. Lady Ada (the author) says the project will “never be available as a kit due to FCC regulations”. Okay. But I still want to build one. Schematic, please? How about a parts list? I’m pretty technically savvy (not with electronics, granted), but I can’t get the information.

Like most “open source” projects, maybe I’m not in the “committer’s club”, but I ask, “does anybody have the ‘open source’?”

Just an FYI: in light of the recent Monster.com leak of customer information, I wanted to delete my user profile. You can’t do this yourself from the website, but if you E-mail siteabuse@monster.com, they will delete it for you. I found this on another blog, but lost the link. Anyway, just wanted to confirm that it does work!

Today, I got a glimpse of what the webopticon is really about, besides being my blog. So today, I got an E-mail from my old supervisor at SSI Services. As you may or may not know, I worked on the Knowledge Center project, a system to coordinate emergency responders, when I was there.

Anyway, so today I get an E-mail telling me that the “City of Pittsburgh” (nothing more specific) “noticed” me when I was taking pictures of the water main break last week. They then contacted SSI to “ask what our relationship was”.

The reason that this is so interesting to me is that I never gave my name out–nor did I really talk to anybody at the scene. They either recognized me from my time at SSI when I went to client meetings (the “client” including some of the same emergency responders who were at the water main break), or, more likely, they used Google to look for information on the water main break.

They then likely found my photos on Flickr and noticed themselves, or remembered me being there. Finding my Flickr photos, they got my name, Googled that, found my resume, and then saw that I worked at SSI (phew!). They then must have called SSI to ask what was going on.

What’s also interesting is that my photo of the PEMA/DHS guy at the scene has 10 more views than any other photo of the incident. Was it him who found the photos on Flickr? I’ll never know, but it’s interesting how Google has turned the Internet into a true panopticon (”webopticon”). Viewers can remain anonymous and get a glimpse into my life, to such a level that they can piece together my movements on a given day, and even my past work/jobs. I guess divulging that information is *my* choice, and I’m not trying to explicitly hide, either. There have also been other examples of Google panopticon-ness.

It what seems like a good omen, the world keeps giving me new ways to explain to people why they should care about infrastructure. Today, the addition is a broken Pittsburgh water main. The ~20″ main broke around noon, and sent water running down the street in such quantities that on-lookers said it looked like a river. Video of the water can be seen at a page on KDKA’s website. My favorite shot is when the stairs literally look like a waterfall. That’s a *lot* of water!

After work, I headed over to the scene to see what was going on. There were roughly six or so bystanders that looked like they weren’t there to work–there were also dozens of construction workers, supervisors, reporters, engineers, PWSA people, PEMA/Department of Homeland Security(!) and police. As you can see in the photos below, it made for a pretty “populated” intersection.

One of my favorite exchanges I witnessed was one of the bystanders telling the PWSA guys “thanks”. The guys said “they needed that”, and thanked the bystander back. Maybe another worker “thanks” project, vis-a-viz “The New York Sanitation Department Project” is in order?